They
say you can take the girl out of the country, but not the country out
of the girl. I was a country girl once.
I
grew up in rural America among farm fields and livestock. I was in
both 4-H and FFA. I attended church, was patriotic and knew how to
shoot a gun. My Family was Republican, Evangelical Christian, and I
was home schooled due to my families belief the public school system
was failing.
Both my parents came from agriculture backgrounds so it seemed
natural to pass that on to their children. My life revolved around
livestock projects and my families love of horses. I was never as
good with horses but I had a myriad of my own animal projects to tend
to and was kept quiet busy. The
church we attended was a start up Evangelical church with a small
congregation, under two hundred people. I don't remember my parents
specific reasons for choosing the church, but the larger church they
had formerly attended had split due to differentiating beliefs. I can
no longer recall any joy I might have had going to church. Much of it
is marred by the control and abuse of my parents and the difficulties
socializing with my own age group. I was bullied and picked on;
frankly i was never fast enough or witty enough at comebacks. I was
also alienated somewhat due to being home schooled. There were other
home school families in the church but despite that there never
seemed to be enough common ground between myself and my peers. And it
wasn't just my peers, there were adults, public school teachers who
would tease about my education. It didn't help that I was not
diagnosed with ADD until years later, or that I had learning
disabilities. I was also under educated by my primary home school
parent. So not only was I the odd kid, but the dumb kid.
My
thoughts about home school are fairly critical, and rightly so. I had
a parent teacher who was unable to provide a good foundation in
education. They were also experiencing spousal abuse and were more
often than not abusive themselves. This made for a difficult
parent/teacher and child relationship. I think home schooling already
makes the distinction between those relationships difficult and
adding abuse makes for no winners. Teaching is a gift that not
everyone possess, and my Parent eventually gave up because I had
learning difficulties. Instead of seeking help they left me on my own
to educate myself. Thankfully I was eventually enrolled in running
start.
My
grandparents were occasionally very concerned about my parents home
schooling me, but this was met by a defensive wall from my parents
who only perceived it as an attack on their choice of home schooling.
This is a common problem that can occur in the Christian home school
community. Families believe that government agencies will try to take
away their rights to teach their children as they see fit. Any
criticism of their methods is an attack upon them, their beliefs and
rights. Quite often with that being the focus; a child's needs can
become a last priority. And in their defensiveness parents like mine
are well armed to deal with opposing opinions. Like with their
religious beliefs there were a standard set of arguments memorized to
defeat any non believers they encountered. And these are the type of
arguments that come with a mindset that anyone opposing is trying to
manipulate and convert you to false beliefs. So the defense
statements are girded to deflect any truly open conversation and
minds are closed.
I
was raised in a traditional Evangelical Christian home, two kids and
nearly white picked fence. For the sake of my safety, and
emotional
well being and not being met with any lawsuits over slander I will
refer to my parents asVaarsuvius
and
Other Parent as seen in the order of the stick Comic (
a gender neutral couple).
Other
parent wanted the white picket fence dream; barefoot, pregnant, and
to be Godly missionaries to the Godless. Vaarsuvius seemed to go
along with this fairly willingly. They both deferred to a patriarchal
model of Christianity with one of them being the primary household
leader and the other submitter (or is that BDSM?)
Unfortunately
and as is too often the case, this model of household is the perfect
incubator for abuse and is a favored environment for abusers.
Adhering to patriarchal Christianity is often a tool used to
perpetrate abuse because it assumes that married partners are equal
but one more so than the other. It assumes this is because one of the
partners is thought to be weaker (even
in a gender neutral situation).
Being
the weaker of the partnership comes with all kinds of assumptions in
Evangelical Christianity (Patriarchal). First accepting the role as
secondary partner means that you are not as intelligent. Second this
lack of intelligence affects you ability to reason. Third this lack
of reasoning means that you are not able to discern things logically
only emotionally. Your sole reliance on emotions to direct you means
that they can be erratic and unreasonable and therefore should not be
trusted by yourself or others around you. This naturally extends to
children who are also presumed to be weaker by the nature of
childhood. As weaker parts of the family unit your human rights are
assigned accordingly. The secondary parent has supreme rights over
the children but not over the primary parent. Children have no
rights. Children may be given some rights by virtue of proving that
they are not bad, compliant, submissive, godly and that the inherent
badness they were born with has been adequately stamped out. But
these rights are very small.
When
it comes to a conservative church and community everyone looks to the
primary partner as the individual family leader. These primary
partners often become church leaders. They are seen as a pinnacle of
Godliness; anyone who tries to contradict this image by presenting
issues of abuse is only seen as trying to maliciously tear down a
good person. And if it is the secondary parent or children speaking
out about abuse please see above section about being unintelligent
and only ruled by emotions- why should anyone believe you? Again
abusers (Other Parent in my case) will use this traditional and
religious structure to their benefit. They are pleasing charmers and
shining church leaders who can behave how they will behind closed
doors at home. No one else will see the behavior and no one would
believe that they are anything than how they present themselves to be
to the outside world. No one believed myself or Vaarsuvius that
Other Parent was an abuser behind closed doors. Because of the
nature of this structure it allows for further abuse, but this time
from the secondary "weaker" partner. Either because they
were always somewhat abusive themselves or because the damage they
take from the primary partner causes them to lash out and transfer
the abuse to those lowest in the hierarchy- the children. Vaarsuvius
was often equally abusive in our family unit. Add to that each parent
tried to pit myself and Other child against one another; it was
chaotic and you couldn't really decide who was the worst parent.
Survival dictated you pick the one that was going to be nice to your
for that day or even for that moment. You constantly had to switch
sides. It was incredibly confusing.
No
one had a clue in our little church about the abuse, or if they did
they brushed it aside in disbelief. Partly I also think this was due
to the nature of the patriarchal christian structure. It is hard to
distinguish between those traditional values and abuse. So what if
the primary parent is a little controlling. In this structure that is
easily dismissed as part of their God defined role. These
blurred lines occur in how children are raised as well. I was spanked
with wooden spoons and horse quirts and my parents believed that I
was to be punished until I submitted, my will was to be bent to
theirs and Gods. So child abuse or traditional family values? For the
record if you hadn't guessed that is child abuse! Traditional "family
values" are also a cover for the parents who take discipline
even farther into the abuse spectrum, as is evidenced by the death of
children subjected to Michael and Debbie Pearls To
Train Up A Child philosophy.
Even beloved psychologist, (I say Psychologist in the very loosest
sense) Dr. Dobson also advocates similar philosophies. The problem
with these philosophies is not that people are wrong for “not
wanting to raise bratty children”. Nor is it simply because a
minority of abusive parents misuse their teachings. It is the root of
those teachings which are inherently problematic. Even when used by
non abusive parents these teachings are harmful when applied to
children.
Quiverfull
home school Christians and Evangelical home school Christians both
frequently adhere to a set of beliefs about child rearing and
government interference. I have talked about their ready defense of
their home school beliefs, but the second part of these beliefs
relates to parenting and child abuse. They quite often believe that
the government will snatch their children away from them, and that
they will be reported to CPS if their child trips and shows up with a
bruise. They believe that CPS is anti parent and is out to get good
Godly parents because CPS is the devil and hates Parents especially
Christian ones. Parents who abuse their children tend to be even more
afraid of the big bad wolf CPS, and for obvious reasons. However
Parents like mine convinced themselves they were not abusive parents
but that it was CPS and the system that were abusive.
Children like
myself are raised with gnarly fairy tales of children being snatched
away and that we had to be careful what we said or the government
would take them away and lock them up forever. I received this
terrifying lecture once when I had commented out loud about my home
environment and that I thought my parents enjoyed spanking me. Other
Parent did in fact enjoy doling out punishment. These
lectures were also focused to prepare us for any doctor visits. We
were trained what to do, what to say or not say if they doctor said
they wanted to talk to us alone. So the very people who might have
caught on to abuse issues would be ignorant of what was actually
going on. Abusers wield the tool of Christianity well. If if the
Secondary partner objects or someone questions
their decisions or authority, they can solidly refer to the Bible to
back them up. This is of course when spiritual abuse enters the
situation, but it's not made out that way. From a traditional
patriarchal christian perspective this is just the natural way of
things, and a Godly way of life.
My
story; A Heart like Mine continued in a follow up post.
No comments:
Post a Comment